Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChristiansen, Ola
dc.contributor.authorBratt, Ola
dc.contributor.authorHaug, Erik Skaaheim
dc.contributor.authorVaktskjold, Arild
dc.contributor.authorSelnes, Anders
dc.contributor.authorJordhøy, Marit Slaaen
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T14:13:11Z
dc.date.available2020-04-14T14:13:11Z
dc.date.created2019-07-03T13:58:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian journal of urology. 2019, 53 (4), 229-234.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-1805
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2651047
dc.description.abstractObjective: To present a code-driven, electronic database for patients TrEated with robotic-assisted radiCaL prostAtectomy (TECLA), developed at Innlandet Hospital (IH), Trust, Norway, for research, local quality control and to deliver data to the National Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN). Clinical data are directly extracted from the structured documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). Materials and methods: The urological department at IH treats about 200 patients with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) annually. All consenting patients registered with the procedure code for RARP are included in TECLA. Clinical data are obtained automatically from the EMR, by structured forms. Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) are filled in by the patients on an iPad or a smartphone. Results: The basic construct of TECLA is presented. From August 2017 to June 2018, 200 men were treated with RARP, of which 182 (91%) provided consent for inclusion in the register. Of these, 97% completed the PROM survey before treatment and 91% at 3 months follow-up. PREMs were completed by 78%. All clinical variables for the hospital stay and for the 6-week follow-up were more than 95% complete. Conclusion: This entirely electronic surgical quality register is easy to use, both for patients and clinicians, and has a high capture rate. The data collection is linked to the clinicians’ workflow, without double data entry, so entering data does not add any extra work. The register design can be used by other hospitals for various surgical procedures.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectProstate cancer;en_US
dc.subjectelectronic database;en_US
dc.subjectpatient-reported experience measures (PREMs);en_US
dc.subjectpatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs);en_US
dc.subjectquality of care;en_US
dc.subjectrobotic-assisted radical prostatectomyen_US
dc.titleTECLA—an innovative technical approach for prostate cancer registriesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderScandinavian journal of urology. Taylor and Francisen_US
dc.source.pagenumber229-234en_US
dc.source.volume53en_US
dc.source.journalScandinavian journal of urologyen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21681805.2019.1634148
dc.identifier.cristin1709818
cristin.unitcode1991,9,0,0
cristin.unitcode1991,2,0,0
cristin.unitnameDiv Psykisk helsevern
cristin.unitnameDiv Elverum-Hamar
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal