Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrendbekken, Randi
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Anette
dc.contributor.authorUrsin, Holger
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hege R.
dc.contributor.authorTangen, Tone
dc.coverage.spatialNorwayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-12T10:44:13Z
dc.date.available2020-03-12T10:44:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationInt J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;23(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9486-y.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1070-5503
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2646527
dc.description.abstractAbstract BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain is associated with comorbidity, extensive use of health services, long-term disability and reduced quality of life. The scientific literature on effects of treatment for musculoskeletal pain is inconclusive. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare a multidisciplinary intervention (MI), including use of the novel Interdisciplinary Structured Interview with a Visual Educational Tool (ISIVET), with a brief intervention (BI), on effects on mental and physical symptoms, functioning ability, use of health services and coping in patients sick-listed due to musculoskeletal pain. METHOD: Two hundred eighty-four adults aged 18-60, referred to a specialist clinic in physical rehabilitation, were randomized to MI or BI. Patients received a medical examination at baseline and completed a comprehensive questionnaire at baseline, 3 months and 12 months. RESULTS: Both groups reported improvements in mental and physical symptoms, including pain, and improved functioning ability at 3 and 12 months, but the MI group improved faster than the BI group except from reports of pain, which had a similar course. Significant interactions between group and time were found on mental symptoms (anxiety (p < 0.05), depression (p < 0.01), somatization (p < 0.01)) and functioning ability (p < 0.01) due to stronger effects in the MI group at 3 months. At 3 and 12 months, the MI group reported significantly less use of health services (general practitioner (p < 0.05)). At 12 months, the MI group reported better self-evaluated capability of coping with complaints (p < 0.001) and they took better care of their own health (p < 0.001), compared to the BI group. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the MI may represent an important supplement in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInnlandet Hospital Trust (Norway) funded the study.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Linken_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectChronic musculoskeletal pain;en_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary treatment;en_US
dc.subjectPatient education tool;en_US
dc.subjectRandomized clinical trialen_US
dc.titleMultidisciplinary Intervention in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber11en_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicineen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12529-015-9486-y
dc.identifier.cristin1243977


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal