Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBrendbekken, Randi
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Anette
dc.contributor.authorUrsin, Holger
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hege R.
dc.contributor.authorTangen, Tone
dc.coverage.spatialNorwayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-12T10:44:13Z
dc.date.available2020-03-12T10:44:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationInt J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;23(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9486-y.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1070-5503
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2646527
dc.description.abstractAbstract BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain is associated with comorbidity, extensive use of health services, long-term disability and reduced quality of life. The scientific literature on effects of treatment for musculoskeletal pain is inconclusive. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare a multidisciplinary intervention (MI), including use of the novel Interdisciplinary Structured Interview with a Visual Educational Tool (ISIVET), with a brief intervention (BI), on effects on mental and physical symptoms, functioning ability, use of health services and coping in patients sick-listed due to musculoskeletal pain. METHOD: Two hundred eighty-four adults aged 18-60, referred to a specialist clinic in physical rehabilitation, were randomized to MI or BI. Patients received a medical examination at baseline and completed a comprehensive questionnaire at baseline, 3 months and 12 months. RESULTS: Both groups reported improvements in mental and physical symptoms, including pain, and improved functioning ability at 3 and 12 months, but the MI group improved faster than the BI group except from reports of pain, which had a similar course. Significant interactions between group and time were found on mental symptoms (anxiety (p < 0.05), depression (p < 0.01), somatization (p < 0.01)) and functioning ability (p < 0.01) due to stronger effects in the MI group at 3 months. At 3 and 12 months, the MI group reported significantly less use of health services (general practitioner (p < 0.05)). At 12 months, the MI group reported better self-evaluated capability of coping with complaints (p < 0.001) and they took better care of their own health (p < 0.001), compared to the BI group. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the MI may represent an important supplement in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInnlandet Hospital Trust (Norway) funded the study.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Linken_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectChronic musculoskeletal pain;en_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary treatment;en_US
dc.subjectPatient education tool;en_US
dc.subjectRandomized clinical trialen_US
dc.titleMultidisciplinary Intervention in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber11en_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicineen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12529-015-9486-y
dc.identifier.cristin1243977


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal