Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Ingvild
dc.contributor.authorStubberud, Jan Egil
dc.contributor.authorHaug, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorMcGurk, Susan R.
dc.contributor.authorHovik, Kjell Tore
dc.contributor.authorUeland, Torill
dc.contributor.authorØie, Merete Glenne
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-11T13:39:26Z
dc.date.available2023-08-11T13:39:26Z
dc.date.created2022-08-12T10:15:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry. 2022, 22 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-244X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3083637
dc.description.abstractBackground Executive functioning is essential to daily life and severely impaired in schizophrenia and psychosis risk syndromes. Goal Management Training (GMT) is a theoretically founded, empirically supported, metacognitive strategy training program designed to improve executive functioning. Methods A randomized controlled parallel group trial compared GMT with treatment as usual among 81 participants (GMT, n = 39 versus Wait List Controls, n = 42) recruited from an early intervention for psychosis setting. Computer generated random allocation was performed by someone independent from the study team and raters post-intervention were unaware of allocation. The primary objective was to assess the impact of GMT administered in small groups for 5 weeks on executive functioning. The secondary objective was to explore the potential of the intervention in influencing daily life functioning and clinical symptoms. Results GMT improved self-reported executive functioning, measured with the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Adult version (BRIEF-A), significantly more than treatment as usual. A linear mixed model for repeated measures, including all partial data according to the principle of intention to treat, showed a significant group x time interaction effect assessed immediately after intervention (post-test) and 6 months after intervention (follow-up), F = 8.40, p .005, r .37. Improvement occurred in both groups in objective executive functioning as measured by neuropsychological tests, functional capacity, daily life functioning and symptoms of psychosis rated by clinicians. Self-reported clinical symptoms measured with the Symptoms Check List (SCL-10) improved significantly more after GMT than after treatment as usual, F = 5.78, p .019, r .29. Two participants withdrew due to strenuous testing and one due to adverse effects. Conclusions GMT had clinically reliable and lasting effects on subjective executive function. The intervention is a valuable addition to available treatment with considerable gains at low cost. Trial registration Registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT03048695 09/02/2017.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was supported by the South-Eastern Norway Health Authority (grant number 2017012); Innlandet Hospital Trust (grant number 150602) and University of Oslo (grant number 353139).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-04197-3
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectCognitive impairment;en_US
dc.subjectCognitive remediation;en_US
dc.subjectEarly intervention;en_US
dc.subjectExecutive function;en_US
dc.subjectPsychosis;en_US
dc.subjectReal-world function.en_US
dc.titleA randomized controlled trial of Goal Management Training for executive functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders or psychosis risk syndromesen_US
dc.title.alternativeA randomized controlled trial of Goal Management Training for executive functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders or psychosis risk syndromesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativeco mmons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber17en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Psychiatryen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12888-022-04197-3
dc.identifier.cristin2042608
dc.relation.projectUniversitetet i Oslo: 353139en_US
dc.relation.projectHelse Sør-Øst RHF: 2017012en_US
dc.relation.projectSykehuset Innlandet HF: 150602en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal