Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKuzman, Martina Rojnic
dc.contributor.authorSlade, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPuschner, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorScanferla, Elisabetta
dc.contributor.authorBajic, Zarko
dc.contributor.authorCourtet, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorSamochowiec, Jerzy
dc.contributor.authorArango, Celso
dc.contributor.authorVahip, Simavi
dc.contributor.authorTaube, Maris
dc.contributor.authorFalkai, Peter
dc.contributor.authorDom, Geert
dc.contributor.authorIzakova, Lubomira
dc.contributor.authorCarpiniello, Bernardo
dc.contributor.authorBellani, Marcella
dc.contributor.authorFiorillo, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorSkugarevsky, Oleg
dc.contributor.authorMihaljevic-Peles, Alma
dc.contributor.authorTelles-Correia, Diogo
dc.contributor.authorNovais, Filipa
dc.contributor.authorMohr, Pavel
dc.contributor.authorWancata, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorHultén, Martin
dc.contributor.authorChkonia, Eka
dc.contributor.authorBalazs, Judit
dc.contributor.authorBeezhold, Julian
dc.contributor.authorLien, Lars
dc.contributor.authorMihajlovic, Goran
dc.contributor.authorDelic, Mirjana
dc.contributor.authorStoppe, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorRacetovic, Goran
dc.contributor.authorBabic, Dragan
dc.contributor.authorMazaliauskiene, Ramune
dc.contributor.authorCozman, Doina
dc.contributor.authorHjerrild, Simon
dc.contributor.authorChihai, Jana
dc.contributor.authorFlannery, William
dc.contributor.authorMelartin, Tarja
dc.contributor.authorMaruta, Nataliya
dc.contributor.authorSoghoyan, Armen
dc.contributor.authorGorwood, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-09T10:37:33Z
dc.date.available2023-05-09T10:37:33Z
dc.date.created2022-11-30T13:09:16Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEuropean psychiatry. 2022, 65 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0924-9338
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3067245
dc.description.abstractBackground: While shared clinical decision-making (SDM) is the preferred approach to decision-making in mental health care, its implementation in everyday clinical practice is still insufficient. The European Psychiatric Association undertook a study aiming to gather data on the clinical decision-making style preferences of psychiatrists working in Europe. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey involving a sample of 751 psychiatrists and psychiatry specialist trainees from 38 European countries in 2021, using the Clinical Decision-Making Style - Staff questionnaire and a set of questions regarding clinicians' expertise, training, and practice. Results: SDM was the preferred decision-making style across all European regions ([central and eastern Europe, CEE], northern and western Europe [NWE], and southern Europe [SE]), with an average of 73% of clinical decisions being rated as SDM. However, we found significant differences in non-SDM decision-making styles: participants working in NWE countries more often prefer shared and active decision-making styles rather than passive styles when compared to other European regions, especially to the CEE. Additionally, psychiatry specialist trainees (compared to psychiatrists), those working mainly with outpatients (compared to those working mainly with inpatients) and those working in community mental health services/public services (compared to mixed and private settings) have a significantly lower preference for passive decision-making style. Conclusions: The preferences for SDM styles among European psychiatrists are generally similar. However, the identified differences in the preferences for non-SDM styles across the regions call for more dialogue and educational efforts to harmonize practice across Europe. Keywords: Clinical decision-making; Europe; mental health; professional-patient relations; psychiatry; shared decision-making. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.en_US
dc.description.abstractClinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countriesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-psychiatry/article/clinical-decisionmaking-style-preferences-of-european-psychiatrists-results-from-the-ambassadors-survey-in-38-countries/47712DBDC580
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectClinical decision-making;en_US
dc.subjectEurope;en_US
dc.subjectmental health;en_US
dc.subjectprofessional-patient relations;en_US
dc.subjectpsychiatry;en_US
dc.subjectshared decision-making;en_US
dc.titleClinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countriesen_US
dc.title.alternativeClinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countriesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s), 2022. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber11en_US
dc.source.volume65en_US
dc.source.journalEuropean psychiatryen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2330
dc.identifier.cristin2085657
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal