Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHao, Quikui
dc.contributor.authorDevji, Tahira
dc.contributor.authorZeraatkar, Dena
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yuting
dc.contributor.authorQasim, Anila
dc.contributor.authorSiemieniuk, Reed A.C.
dc.contributor.authorVandvik, Per Olav
dc.contributor.authorLähdeoja, Tuomas
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco-Labra, Alonso
dc.contributor.authorAgoritsas, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGuyatt, Gordon
dc.coverage.spatialNorwayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-25T14:24:54Z
dc.date.available2020-03-25T14:24:54Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e028777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028777en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2648636
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To identify credible anchor-based minimal important differences (MIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relevant to a BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain. DESIGN: Systematic review. OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimates of anchor-based MIDs, and their credibility, for PROMs judged by the parallel BMJ Rapid Recommendations panel as important for informing their recommendation (pain, function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO up to August 2018. STUDY SELECTION AND REVIEW METHODS: We included original studies of any intervention for shoulder conditions reporting estimates of anchor-based MIDs for relevant PROMs. Two reviewers independently evaluated potentially eligible studies according to predefined selection criteria. Six reviewers, working in pairs, independently extracted data from eligible studies using a predesigned, standardised, pilot-tested extraction form and independently assessed the credibility of included studies using an MID credibility tool. RESULTS: We identified 22 studies involving 5562 patients that reported 74 empirically estimated anchor-based MIDs for 10 candidate instruments to assess shoulder pain, function and HRQoL. We identified MIDs of high credibility for pain and function outcomes and of low credibility for HRQoL. We offered median estimates for the systematic review team who applied these MIDs in Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence summaries and in their interpretations of results in the linked systematic review addressing the effectiveness of surgery for shoulder pain. CONCLUSIONS: Our review provides anchor-based MID estimates, as well as a rating of their credibility, for PROMs for patients with shoulder conditions. The MID estimates inform the interpretation for a linked systematic review and guideline addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain, and could also prove useful for authors addressing other interventions for shoulder problems.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectminimal important differences;en_US
dc.subjectpatient-reported outcome measures;en_US
dc.subjectshoulder conditionen_US
dc.titleMinimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: A systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-10en_US
dc.source.volume9en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028777
dc.identifier.cristin1699824
dc.relation.projectPROSPERO registration number CRD42018106531en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 Internasjonal