Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTikkinen, Kari A.O.
dc.contributor.authorDahm, Philipp
dc.contributor.authorLytvyn, Lyubov
dc.contributor.authorHeen, Anja Fog
dc.contributor.authorVernooij, Robin W.M.
dc.contributor.authorSiemieniuk, Reed A.C.
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, Russell
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, Bill
dc.contributor.authorFobuzi, Awah Cletus
dc.contributor.authorBlanker, Marco H.
dc.contributor.authorJunod, Noelle
dc.contributor.authorSommer, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorStirnemann, Jérôme
dc.contributor.authorYoshimura, Manabu
dc.contributor.authorAuer, Reto
dc.contributor.authorMacDonald, Helen
dc.contributor.authorGuyatt, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorVandvik, Per Olav
dc.contributor.authorAgoritsas, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T08:46:02Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T08:46:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBMJ . 2018 Sep 5;362:k3581. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3581.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1756-1833
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2659455
dc.description.abstractWhat is the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in prostate cancer? An expert panel produced these recommendations based on a linked systematic review.1 The review was triggered by a large scale, cluster randomised trial on PSA screening in men without a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer published in 2018 (box 1).2 It found no difference between one-time PSA screening and standard practice in prostate cancer mortality but found an increase in the detection of low risk prostate cancer after a median follow-up of 10 years. Although the results of this study suggest screening is not worthwhile, several guidelines advocate offering screening in some cases. The study was much larger than previous studies, and existing trials had published more extended follow-up results, and the BMJ Rapid Recommendations team felt these merited a new appraisal of the body of evidence. This guideline aims to promptly and transparently translate potentially practice-changing evidence to usable recommendations for clinicians and patients, based on the GRADE framework and following standards for trustworthy guidelines. The panel suggests against systematic PSA screening (weak recommendation). The panel members judged that most men will decline screening because the benefit is small and uncertain and there are clear harms. However, there is likely considerable variation in values and preferences. Men with family history of prostate cancer, African descent or of lower socioeconomic status, having higher baseline risk of prostate cancer death, may be more likely to choose PSA screening. Shared decision-making is needed for men considering screening. Box 2 shows all of the articles and evidence linked in this Rapid Recommendation package. The main infographic provides an overview of the absolute benefits and harms of PSA screening. The table at the end of the article shows any evidence that has emerged since the publication of this guideline.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectAged;en_US
dc.subjectDecision Making / ethicsen_US
dc.subjectEarly Detection of Cancer / methodsen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLower Urinary Tract Symptoms / diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMass Screening / standards*en_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPractice Patterns, Physicians' / standards*en_US
dc.subjectProstate-Specific Antigen / blood*en_US
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms / blooden_US
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicen_US
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms / diagnosis*en_US
dc.titleProstate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: A clinical practice guidelineen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyrights © 2019 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-12en_US
dc.source.journalBMJen_US
dc.source.issueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmj.k3581
dc.identifier.cristin1672429


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal