Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRenolen, Åste
dc.contributor.authorHøye, Sevald
dc.contributor.authorHjaelmhult, Esther
dc.contributor.authorDanbolt, Lars Johan
dc.contributor.authorKirkevold, Marit
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-11T12:36:46Z
dc.date.available2018-05-11T12:36:46Z
dc.date.created2017-09-21T09:46:24Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Nursing Studies. 2017, 77 179-188.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0020-7489
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2497960
dc.description.abstractBackground Evidence-based practice is considered a foundation for the provision of quality care and one way to integrate scientific knowledge into clinical problem-solving. Despite the extensive amount of research that has been conducted to evaluate evidence-based practice implementation and research utilization, these practices have not been sufficiently incorporated into nursing practice. Thus, additional research regarding the challenges clinical nurses face when integrating evidence-based practice into their daily work and the manner in which these challenges are approached is needed. Objectives The aim of this study was to generate a theory about the general patterns of behaviour that are discovered when clinical nurses attempt to integrate evidence-based practice into their daily work. Design We used Glaser’s classical grounded theory methodology to generate a substantive theory. Settings The study was conducted in two different medical wards in a large Norwegian hospital. In one ward, nurses and nursing assistants were developing and implementing new evidence-based procedures, and in the other ward, evidence-based huddle boards for risk assessment were being implemented. Participants A total of 54 registered nurses and 9 assistant nurses were observed during their patient care and daily activities. Of these individuals, thirteen registered nurses and five assistant nurses participated in focus groups. These participants were selected through theoretical sampling. Methods Data were collected during 90 hours of observation and 4 focus groups conducted from 2014 to 2015. Each focus group session included four to five participants and lasted between 55 and 65 minutes. Data collection and analysis were performed concurrently, and the data were analysed using the constant comparative method. Results “Keeping on track” emerged as an explanatory theory for the processes through which the nurses handled their main concern: the risk of losing the workflow. The following three strategies were used by nurses when attempting to integrate evidence-based practices into their daily work: “task juggling”, “pausing for considering” and “struggling along with quality improvement”. Conclusions The “keeping on track” theory contributes to the body of knowledge regarding clinical nurses’ experiences with evidence-based practice integration. The nurses endeavoured to minimize workflow interruptions to avoid decreasing the quality of patient care provided, and evidence-based practices were seen as a consideration that was outside of their ordinary worknb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectClinical competencenb_NO
dc.subjectEvidence-based practicenb_NO
dc.subjectFocus groupsnb_NO
dc.subjectGrounded theorynb_NO
dc.subjectKnowledgenb_NO
dc.subjectNursing staffnb_NO
dc.subjectHospitalnb_NO
dc.subjectNursesnb_NO
dc.subjectObservationnb_NO
dc.subjectResearch utilizationnb_NO
dc.subjectWorkflownb_NO
dc.title“Keeping on track” − Hospital nurses’ struggles with maintaining workflow while seeking to integrate evidence-based practice into their daily work: A grounded theory studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber179-188nb_NO
dc.source.volume77nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Nursing Studiesnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.006
dc.identifier.cristin1496182
cristin.unitcode1991,6,0,0
cristin.unitcode1991,9,0,0
cristin.unitnameDiv Lillehammer
cristin.unitnameDiv Psykisk helsevern
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal