Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCastro Tejera, Valeria
dc.contributor.authorÖhman, Lena
dc.contributor.authorAabakken, Lars
dc.contributor.authorFellström, Bengt
dc.contributor.authorHausken, Trygve
dc.contributor.authorHovde, Øistein
dc.contributor.authorHreinsson, Johann P.
dc.contributor.authorLindberg, Greger
dc.contributor.authorVenge, Per
dc.contributor.authorSimrén, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorTörnblom, Hans
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-18T10:16:02Z
dc.date.available2023-08-18T10:16:02Z
dc.date.created2022-10-24T13:54:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2022, 56 (6), 968-979.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0269-2813
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3084783
dc.description.abstractBackground: Low-grade immune activation in the gut is a potential treatment target in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Aims: To determine improvement in IBS symptoms after mesalazine treatment, and the utility of measures of immune activity in the rectal mucosa METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multicentre trial in subjects with IBS (Rome III criteria), with an eight-week treatment period of mesalazine 2400 mg or plcebo once-daily. The primary endpoint was the global assessment of satisfactory relief of IBS symptoms in ≥50% of weeks during intervention. IBS symptoms were also measured with the IBS severity scoring system; immune activity was measured by mucosal patch technology. A post hoc meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials of mesalazine in IBS was added. Results: Of 181 included patients, 91 received mesalazine and 90 received placebo. The primary endpoint was met by 32 (36%) patients after mesalazine and 27 (30%) after placebo (p = 0.40). There were no differences in response rates related to IBS subtype or post-infection symptom onset. More reduction of abdominal bloating was noted in the mesalazine group (p = 0.02). The meta-analysis showed no effect of mesalazine on IBS symptoms. No mucosal patch technology measure could predict response to mesalazine, and found no differences in the effects of intervention on levels of immune markers. Conclusions: Mesalazine is ineffective in reducing IBS symptoms. Rectal measures of immune activity by the mucosal patch technology cannot predict a higher chance of response to mesalazine.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by Eurostars project grant E!5691, an unrestricted grant from Tillotts Pharma AB (mesalazine (Asacol) and placebo), and by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils ALFagreement (ALFGBG 295071, 620,221, 726,561, 875,581).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBiomarkers;en_US
dc.subjectClinical Protocols;en_US
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Method;en_US
dc.subjectHumans;en_US
dc.subjectMulticenter Studies as Topic;en_US
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic;en_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome;en_US
dc.subjectIrritable Bowel Syndrome* / drug therapy;en_US
dc.subjectMesalamine* / therapeutic use;en_US
dc.titleRandomised clinical trial and meta-analysis: mesalazine treatment in irritable bowel syndrome—effects on gastrointestinal symptoms and rectal biomarkers of immune activityen_US
dc.title.alternativeRandomised clinical trial and meta-analysis: mesalazine treatment in irritable bowel syndrome—effects on gastrointestinal symptoms and rectal biomarkers of immune activityen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. © 2022 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber968-979en_US
dc.source.volume56en_US
dc.source.journalAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeuticsen_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/apt.17182
dc.identifier.cristin2064464
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal